I don't understand the debate on RAW or not... use or don't use. It's a sensor and it has the capability to capture RAW if FW permitted. Many don't use RAW on
M2P or
M3 now... it's a choice. To me the RAW is independent of the Quality, it's the ability to work with the image better in post. Using De-Noise & Sharpen tools work better with RAW images... often producing very satisfying results.
If we step back just a short period of time (years), it'd be considered a great mini-telephoto aerial lens capable of producing beautiful images. It's defiantly not a MFT, but it's still a nice useable lens & sensor. With recent FW updates, it looks capable to be helpful for various inspection images... again those can be enhanced with RAW Tools.
The Hasselblad site... highlighted section out of detail... indicates it's a useable lens: "creative possibilities".
** subsection from Web Paragraph **
Mavic 3’s second camera features a 162mm tele lens with 28x Hybrid Zoom (digital + optical) and aperture of f/4.4 that can freely bring distant objects visually closer, offering the user more dynamic perspectives and creative possibilities at a distance. The new Vision Detection Auto Focus technology for quick focusing allows the Hasselblad camera to work with multiple vision sensors on board to capture distance data to optimize focusing speed.
www.hasselblad.com
I'd gladly accept any enhancements for the
M3, many I probably wouldn't appreciate until presented.
I'd really like to see SDK get into the hands of 3rd Party Developers to get the
M3 Map Ready!
Next I'd like to see the Wide Angle Lens gain a few lens correction profiles in LR, On1, DXO.