Mavic4 Pro

[GadgetGuy]

My Mini 5 Pro Combo with RC-N3 is being properly declared by my S. Korean seller who said "No USA Tariffs" in the listing title.

The Description, Harmonized Code, and Country of Manufacture are all authentic and truthful. Hopefully, no tariff bill upon delivery! Seller must have already prepaid them on his end, if he can legitimately put "No USA Tariffs" in the eBay listing title.

Separately purchased regular battery was also properly declared on its Commodity Information.


Look under the "shipping details" link under the shipping section for access to the Commodity Information.

 

[mavic3usa]

My Mini 5 Pro Combo with RC-N3 is being properly declared by my S. Korean seller who said "No USA Tariffs" in the listing title.

The Description, Harmonized Code, and Country of Manufacture are all authentic and truthful. Hopefully, no tariff bill upon delivery! Seller must have already prepaid them on his end, if he can legitimately put "No USA Tariffs" in the eBay listing title.

Separately purchased regular battery was also properly declared on its Commodity Information.
View attachment 185355

Look under the "shipping details" link under the shipping section for access to the Commodity Information.

This seems to be in line with the Chinese sellers on eBay which are all marked as "No additional charges or fees or tariffs at checkout, not expected to pay more." Perhaps this is a pause on China or they're all prepaid or something else going on with China that we don't know about. If only all Korean and Japanese sellers would properly mark their shipments as China......?

 

[PyroProdigy]

May have something to do with this? I'm not sure . They could be paying the tariffs themselves or declaring the item at a much lower value and paying a much lower tariff.
Article below on Supreme Court ruling
↓↓↓
Supreme Court Rules Trump's Tariffs illegal, but tariffs can still continue until October.

 

[moldorf]

May have something to do with this? I'm not sure . They could be paying the tariffs themselves or declaring the item at a much lower value and paying a much lower tariff.
Article below on Supreme Court ruling
↓↓↓
Supreme Court Rules Trump's Tariffs illegal, but tariffs can still continue until October.

just a quibble, but that's an Appeals Court ruling, not a SCOTUS ruling. It's been appealed

 

[PyroProdigy]

just a quibble, but that's an Appeals Court ruling, not a SCOTUS ruling. It's been appealed

Yes I did say October, which is when the appeal hearing is.

 

[mavic3usa]

May have something to do with this? I'm not sure . They could be paying the tariffs themselves or declaring the item at a much lower value and paying a much lower tariff.
Article below on Supreme Court ruling
↓↓↓
Supreme Court Rules Trump's Tariffs illegal, but tariffs can still continue until October.

just a quibble, but that's an Appeals Court ruling, not a SCOTUS ruling. It's been appealed

Yes I did say October, which is when the appeal hearing is.

I know what I'd like to see but I'm afraid it's going to be more of the same and SCOTUS will likely not cancel the tariffs and force the government to reimburse any money. They'll probably say if Congress wants to speak up and do something about it, they're more than welcome to but we're not going to "interfere." Hearing and dates are basically moot; take advantage now while it seems like some tariff confusion is abound.