Not convinced about that. Admittedly there's very little direct image/video samples out so far to test but DPReview has images to play with.
The f/1.7 is giving very noticeable loss of sharpness in the corner and quite significant shadow noise which id expect from that sort of sensor.
I can see me having to crop the edges quite a lot as per mavic 1. Not a huge fan of 4:3 either - i find 3:2 much easier native.
DR doesn't look great but thats harder to measure.
I was hoping the video quality might be better than the M2P purely due to the advertised increased bit rate. M2P 100mbps really does see compression artefacts, stutter and so on. 150mbps in theory should be a lot better *IF* it uses that bit rate for all modes. Without real world samples to look at the metadata the jury is still out.
The very few available video samples so far seem to show some intraframe flicker (the M1 had a lot of this) and pulsing on areas like foreground foliage. Quite if thats a real problem or a result of youtube compression and conversions again i don't know.
Ultimately though i can likely get acceptable images in places and areas where previously i couldnt legally get anything at all. Im not after a M2P replacement - i want a lightweight, restriction free complement to it.

The f/1.7 is giving very noticeable loss of sharpness in the corner and quite significant shadow noise which id expect from that sort of sensor.
I can see me having to crop the edges quite a lot as per mavic 1. Not a huge fan of 4:3 either - i find 3:2 much easier native.
DR doesn't look great but thats harder to measure.
I was hoping the video quality might be better than the M2P purely due to the advertised increased bit rate. M2P 100mbps really does see compression artefacts, stutter and so on. 150mbps in theory should be a lot better *IF* it uses that bit rate for all modes. Without real world samples to look at the metadata the jury is still out.
The very few available video samples so far seem to show some intraframe flicker (the M1 had a lot of this) and pulsing on areas like foreground foliage. Quite if thats a real problem or a result of youtube compression and conversions again i don't know.
Ultimately though i can likely get acceptable images in places and areas where previously i couldnt legally get anything at all. Im not after a M2P replacement - i want a lightweight, restriction free complement to it.