I knew I should not have asked to look.
They are superb and better than I was expecting after reading all the stuff about the camera. I could see from the jpegs that the dynamic range was better than my Pro but even without any sharpening the RAW images come out of ACR looking just so full of detail. I have been using my Mavic Pro for video nearly exclusively and have followed the flock in going for the cinematic look where the absolute quality of the camera is not so important. I have hardly taken any still images as they are often disappointing unless the light is exceptional and they only look good then because you don't notice how soft they are. I know that sharpness is not everything but to get the best out of any RAW image takes a bit of effort and I have been so spoiled by my dSLR that now most of my Mavic images seem not worth the effort. I think the M2 might change that.
I was thinking of changing to a Mavic Air but now the M2 is back in the frame.
Thanks for posting
EDIIT: I consider my skills at post processing a RAW image as little better than average at best so would be interested in reading the opinion of anyone who thinks they are good at getting the most out of RAW. .