My goodness. . .i spoke to our town local cop i personally know about it, other day, so he told me that they have instructions to confiscate the drone if they see one flying at night over town central streets. they obviously do not care much of what happens far away from there. but, what to do after that - i guess they can give it back after you spend enough time arguing with them later - find out for yourself if you need. i bet if one is looking for a trouble - one will find it.
If flying over streets (where people/traffic are active) that's the violation... day or night... You're mixing different regulations (incorrectly) to make a point.
You need to have another conversation with your "town local cop" and have him contact his LEAP representative for some guidance. Merely a hobbyist "flying at night" is not a violation of any of the FARs what so ever. Pass this email address along to your "town local cop" so they can get the needed guidance to be more knowledgeable about sUAS regulations: [email protected]
or try these methods: [email protected] or call us at 844-FLY-MY-UA
Don't take my word for it on this topic... reach out to your local FSDO and pose the same question... "Is it currently legal for a hobbyist to fly a drone at night if they are obeying all other laws & regulations? " Here's the direct # to your FSDO
(781) 238-7500 |
is there a current legal document where it is written with those words hobbyist, night, drone all used in the same sentence? you can present one in a printed format for your defense during a conflict with a LEO at the middle of the night? the best assumption one can have - that it is still in the 'open for an interpretation' phase for LEO - but, why to get into such situation?
There is not and there doesn't need to be. The FARs are written to address issues that need addressing. They also don't say, "It's ok to fly over clear/open spaces" but we know it's legal to do do. If something is restricted within the FARs it is clearly written as such.
and about 'overlooking' - really, it is a bit childish to presume that an absence of the specific sentence in the FAA document language will warrant your activity in the eyes of any judge, if it will make it to the court of law. the spirit of the regulation is very clear and it is as stated in the document link to which i provided. it is just what i think about this. not all that is not explicitly forbidden is actually allowed - it is just one of such cases.
The document you linked clearly stated Part 107 rules and we are clearly speaking HOBBY operations. You're again incorrectly mixing regulations and that's not how this works.