An interesting article with a surprising level of detail on the efforts to achieve armor defeating capabilities with a Mavic 3 payload:
Read it here:Unfortunately I can’t view this article as you apparently need to have a subscription to the NY Times. Sounds like an interesting article though.
Chris
I agree with your sentiments completely, but I think that this has much wider significance, in that such an inexpensive tool is already fundamentally changing the balance of armed conflict.Thanks for restoring the Topic and for Yaris for posting the alternate link.
I found the article interesting and sad at the same time because it has forced people living through a senseless war to become creative to find ways to use a product - the Mavic 3, that was designed as a photography tool, to use it instead for a tool for war.
Chris
I agree. I think drones and other automated technology are the future and will sooner or later replace conventional combat in wars and conflicts.I agree with your sentiments completely, but I think that this has much wider significance, in that such an inexpensive tool is already fundamentally changing the balance of armed conflict.
I don't actually think that they will succeed in their immediate goal of defeating battle tank armor with a 1 lb munition; they almost certainly don't have the expertise to develop such a marginal system. But that's just a matter of time and future increases in payload capabilities. It will be a game changer.
Isn't it the agricultural drones that have the highest payload capacity for the price. Why does the article choose or talk about using a mavic3. Almost sounds like a anti DJI marketing scheme.
for example: 6Axis Agriculture Drone 1650mm Agricultural UAV Drone Frame Capacity 15L Tank* | eBay
Because that's the platform that the Ukrainian military are using, so it would be weird to talk about a different platform.Why does the article choose or talk about using a mavic3.
Why do you think they chose the Mavic 3 platform. Are the heavier payload drones not in their budget.?Because that's the platform that the Ukrainian military are using, so it would be weird to talk about a different platform.
I don't know, but I would guess because it is readily available as a consumer product, rather than because it is cheap. Competent heavy-lift UAVs are much harder to find. I rather doubt that the one that you linked above is what it seems.Why do you think they chose the Mavic 3 platform. Are the heavier payload drones not in their budget.?
Otherwise you'd have to learn how to operate a military grade plane looking thing drone.I don't know, but I would guess because it is readily available as a consumer product, rather than because it is cheap. Competent heavy-lift UAVs are much harder to find. I rather doubt that the one that you linked above is what it seems.
What about this drone?I don't know, but I would guess because it is readily available as a consumer product, rather than because it is cheap. Competent heavy-lift UAVs are much harder to find. I rather doubt that the one that you linked above is what it seems.
If you want to go into combat on a budget with a decent carry capacity, this drone makes better sense than a mav 3. Maybe they are using the mav 3 classic. It's a bit cheaper. But I would do a little more research if I was going to try and damage or disable a tank. WHEN DISABLING TANKS, THE MAIN GOAL IS TO DAMAGE THE TRACKS THAT PROPEL THE TANK. THE GOAL IS TO DISABLE IT'S MOVEMENT.What about this drone?
DJI S1000+
This is one of the cheapest RC drones for sale and it also might just be the best. This lightweight octacopter has eight powerful motors which can fold up to save space. But that portability doesn’t come at the expense of convenience – the S1000+ can be set up in only a few minutes.
Beyond that, you’re getting a durable carbon fiber body, a 4 pound weight limit (most professional cameras come in at about 2.5 pounds including the lens) and a 25 minute flight time, all at a cost of only $1,500. If you’re looking for an all-around good gas powered drone backed by the DJI reputation for quality, look no further.
Features:
![]()
• Low cost of $1500 USD
• Can carry 4 pounds of weight
• 25 minute flight time
• Most portable gas powered drone
• Removable central board
They rewarded the one kid at the white house for buying an alarm clock from radio shack. The possibilities are endless.WHY NOT DO THIS AS WELL.
![]()
DIY Guided Missile (…err Model Rocket)
Hackers [Navic] and [K.o.D] have fitted an Arduino Pro Mini and an array of components into an off the shelf rocketry kit to create a guided model rocket, taking the whole idea of Arduino-based spa…hackaday.com
DIY GUIDED MODEL ROCKETS BUILT USING ESTES ROCKETS, TAIL FIN SERVOS AND GPS GUIDANCE TO HIT TARGET.
It's easy. A no brainer.
I am suspicious of this WEAPONIZED DJI M3 article. I THINK IT'S AN ATTACK ON DJI. I THINK GOVERNMENTS ARE WORRIED ABOUT HOW ACCURATE THEY ARE AND HOW EASILY WEAPONAIZED THEY CAN BECOME.
I remember when a 18 yo kid put a handgun on a drone (self-built, it looks like). He then used a servo to pull the trigger. It probably scared the crap out of parents and politicians everywhere.
HERE IS THE VIDEO LINK: THE NEWS IS GOVERNMENT RUN, OBVIOUSLY. THEY CRUCIFIED THIS KID FOR CREATIVITY. HE PROBABLY WORKS FOR THE USA MILITARY NOW.
i ALLREADY LINKED THAT ONE IN POST #16They rewarded the one kid at the white house for buying an alarm clock from radio shack. The possibilities are endless.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.