icecoldgin
Well-Known Member
Night flying is great for hyperlapses.
Here is short one I did a fortnight ago.
Here is short one I did a fortnight ago.
So "Hyperlapse" is just a "time lapse" thing?Night flying is great for hyperlapses.
Here is short one I did a fortnight ago.
Yes. Controls are variable... but I often get a 10-12 second Hyperlapse from a 20-22minute flight.So "Hyperlapse" is just a "time lapse" thing?
Thanks "they" keep talking abut it without really saying what it did... if they just called it Time lapse, I would have known!Yes. Controls are variable... but I often get a 10-12 second Hyperlapse from a 20-22minute flight.
Here’s an example:Thanks "they" keep talking abut it without really saying what it did... if they just called it Time lapse, I would have known!
I have yet to try any of the "auto" picture functions... some day...
VERY COOL!!! So then the drone just hovers while it shoots this??Here’s an example:
actual was 23 minutes. Drone just hovers... although you can fly it around if you want.VERY COOL!!! So then the drone just hovers while it shoots this??
And very nice video! How long was it actually shooting?
Well... per the perhaps not so precise definition, a timelapse is done from mainly a fixed location into a constant direction, some slow & short panning or/and pitching can be included though. A hyperlapse on the other hand, mean that movement of the camera should be included to a much greater extent.So "Hyperlapse" is just a "time lapse" thing?
Or try setting individual pics at lesser intervals.Well... per the perhaps not so precise definition, a timelapse is done from mainly a fixed location into a constant direction, some slow & short panning or/and pitching can be included though. A hyperlapse on the other hand, mean that movement of the camera should be included to a much greater extent.
Don't think timelapse vs. hyperlapse have anything to do with a compressed timeline as such... both mean speeding up the depicted event. It's all about camera movement...Or try setting individual pics at lesser intervals.
Another option would be compressing the timeline in post processing.
Don’t see the other example yet...Don't think timelapse vs. hyperlapse have anything to do with a compressed timeline as such... both mean speeding up the depicted event. It's all about camera movement...
This is what I should call a timelapse...
... and this, a hyperlapse.
Yeah I know what you mean & it's here the fuzziness of these 2 comes in play ... hyperlapse is kind of a new expression (started to become commonly used from approx 2014), in the past it was called dynamic lapse & meant a time lapse with freedom to move or transport the camera through the scene, the pure time lapse was always shot from a single location with minimal movements. Both time & hyperlapses can be made either by joining several stills on the same video timeline or by simply speeding up a video shot. My 2 earlier attached clips (hopefully the second is shown now ...) consists of several hundreds of stills joined in Davinci Resolve.Don’t see the other example yet...
but here’s how I think about it:
Hyperlapse - a series of still images taken at prescribed intervals. Admittedly a DJI program mode. Chosen as a format before shooting video.
Timelapse - the speeding up of a video in post-production to compress a regular video. This requires working with frame rate to keep the video fluid in appearance.
I fully agree that camera movement must be controlled.
we’re kind of saying the same thing I believe.
CASA don't want to put any effort into controlling drones, they just want to be seen to be doing something to keep morons in the Federal Senate transport committee happy (look up senate hearings into control of drones). Believe it or not, most of the hearings questioning was lead by a senator who owns a trucking company and was probably concerned about the future impact on his business of drone delivery. Also, basically, Australias rules have been copied and pasted from the general vibe that is floating around out there, mostly the US.I don't get why night flying is so dangerous either. Lights easier to see, less people around. What's the issue for the likes of CASA (in Australia) to ban such night flying? I have asked them, but no response. I asked them numerous other questions also such as why keep 30m distant from any person, why 5.5 km from an airport, why VLOS.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.