- Joined
- Oct 3, 2017
- Messages
- 1,118
- Reactions
- 764
Google Maps does not stream a live view a drone with a video camera can. It was most likely an FPV type camera that sends a raster video signal not WiFi. If you look at the security TFR in place over the nation’s capitol you would realize that drone flights of any type are forbidden.I fail to really see the relevance of a drone with a 720p camera to national defense. "... for reconnaissance use...". A drone with a 720p camera must be of the lowest quality possible. How they could consider that a "security issue" I fail to see. It's essentially a toy at the point! I bet anyone could get better photos from Google Maps satellite view (not really but you get the point)!
I understand that but as far as I can tell, the drone wasn't flown. Therefore, it has about as much value as does a cellphone. Also, let's say it did takeoff. It was likely a toy drone and if a child had had it, I doubt any fuss would have been raised. But still, as you said, any drone flights are prohibited, but again, nothing was said that the drone was flown. Therefore, no law was broken that I know of. Why the fuss? As I stated above, the drone would have been as much of a threat as a cellphone camera if not much much more conspicuous.Google Maps does not stream a live view a drone with a video camera can. It was most likely an FPV type camera that sends a raster video signal not WiFi. If you look at the security TFR in place over the nation’s capitol you would realize that drone flights of any type are forbidden.
I guess I don’t understand what you don’t understand.
They tried to use it to look where they couldn't from the ground.Sounds like they weren't smart enough to pick something without geofencing.Might have provided some info for the insurrectionists.Most criminals aren't very smart.I understand that but as far as I can tell, the drone wasn't flown. Therefore, it has about as much value as does a cellphone. Also, let's say it did takeoff. It was likely a toy drone and if a child had had it, I doubt any fuss would have been raised. But still, as you said, any drone flights are prohibited, but again, nothing was said that the drone was flown. Therefore, no law was broken that I know of. Why the fuss? As I stated above, the drone would have been as much of a threat as a cellphone camera if not much much more conspicuous.
Was Ralph Kramden there? He would have said, "You're a riot, Alice."
But it was a riot, where is the funny in that?Was Ralph Kramden there? He would have said, "Your a riot, Alice."
It would be easy to fly any drone over a power distribution centre and crash a length of steel cable over the wires and trip the overlaod protection. This would only cause a short term blackout but it would be very inconvenientI fail to really see the relevance of a drone with a 720p camera to national defense. "... for reconnaissance use...". A drone with a 720p camera must be of the lowest quality possible. How they could consider that a "security issue" I fail to see. It's essentially a toy at the point! I bet anyone could get better photos from Google Maps satellite view (not really but you get the point)! Military satellites could do a much better job, why utilize a drone with a trashy camera? And as far as I know, DJI doesn't have any drones with a 720p camera other than maybe the Spark and the Tello (not 100% sure though) so DJI's geofencing wouldn't be applicable. Most likely, it was a toy drone like a Parrot Mambo or something.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.