Took off straight up to 25 feet, sat for a few seconds, then up to 150 feet. Flew out to 1800 feet away. Hit rth, landed within 2 inches. The picture is the key. Used the floormat out of my truck as the landing pad.
I want to use a dock at a lake for take offs and returns. I've seen landing pads available with high contrast markings. Would this increase RTH accuracy. My dock is 8 feet wide and I don't want my Mavic landing in the water.
Ahhh, thanks for the clarification, makes sense.No need to hover. Just take off straight and steady for 10 meters. It takes a series of photos to plot/recognize its return.
If I'm at a sports field or tennis court and not using a landing pad, I always try and place the Mavic right on a line when I take off so it has something very specific to target when landing instead of a big open colored patch.Actually the 10m is just a guide. So is the straight and steady. Seems like some Landings pads may even foil a precision landing.
My take is that a near vertical climb is required, the min height is not, nor is a constant heading. I just ran a few tests always climbing vertically. First one was vertical 6m (20') and then flew off a distance before climbing to min RTH and hitting RTH. Precision LDG worked fine - so no need for a hard and fast 10m. Did this a few times and it is repeatable. Second test was take off and immediately hit full yaw and spiral madly up to just over 10m (33'), and again flew off a distance before climbing to min RTH and hitting RTH. Precision LDG again worked just fine. So no need for a constant heading at all. Again this is totally repeatable.
On the one occasion that it hung, up I took off from a sport field using a single 1 foot square & very bright green patch of grass as the take off spot. On return it Precision Landed (after a spiral climb) but hovered at 1' with "Ground unsuitable for LDG" warning instead of "Ground Plain safe to land". This is probably the same issue that foils some landing matts. I am not convinced high contrast is good as it can seemingly upset the Safe LDG site check.
I think you just need to be able to keep the LDG area in the cameras field of view above a landing area with a pattern it can resolve and record as it recedes.
Yes that would work.If I'm at a sports field or tennis court and not using a landing pad, I always try and place the Mavic right on a line when I take off so it has something very specific to target when landing instead of a big open colored patch.
That's a good point. Maybe it could say something like, "visual acquired, precision landing will be attempted on RTH"
I just find myself hovering there wondering, did it get it yet??? [emoji1]
Sent from my Nexus 6P using MavicPilots mobile app
Either method triggers the same RTH process, which may include a precision landing.
If you cant get a straight answer from the posts here, try the user manual. Page 16 "RTH Safety Notices" explains it all.
No it wont climb to 50m.
Personally, I would never rely on any form of self-landing if I'm that close to water or any hazards. I've had mixed experiences with and without landing pads. I always eyeball and land manually these days.
Your belief is demonstrably incorrect. So as people do not get confused, it is one and the same function, wiht two methods to trigger it. DJI refer to it as Smart RTH. In laymen terms, it is when you tell it to RTH, as against Low battery or Failsafe LOS RTH. I wont sprout the manual but it is described on p14 under Smart RTH in case anybody wants clarification.I believe the return to home function on the controller will climb or descend to a specific altitude you set then return to home, if you use the app and swipe it will return to home at the altitude you are currently at when you swipe the screen.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.