Well would you like to find another article on it that suits you ?Same comment I made on PP - that's a really callous article focussing more on the airspace, the regulations and whether the drone was registered than the fact that someone was killed.
Well would you like to find another article on it that suits you ?
That was just the first one I saw on it .
Sorry just jumped sar .I wasn't criticizing you for posting it. It's certainly newsworthy and relevant.
Sorry just jumped sar .
Not what. Who.What is Sar?
Were there no more articles/new about this?
If i die collecting a drone, I don't wan't some Hack in the ClaytonDaily?
using it as a Sentence in his NFZ article.
He then lists the FAA rules, Seriously WTf?
( Mod Removed )
I wasn’t aware that flying in a nfz was illegal.
Restricted yes. Am I wrong?
He’s dead. The point of my earlier post is that our laws no longer apply and of course of the abusive nature of the report which was really a rant against the man and drone pilots without regard to his grieving surviving family members.Maybe the better question is, was the pilot in violation?
Maybe the better question is, was the pilot in violation?
The article only mentions that it was a restricted area.
Not convinced the reporter has that information correct, so more info may be needed to make that determination.
I’m not reading that it’s the pilot that died. Another piece of the puzzle that’s not clear, courtesy of the reporter not doing a good job.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.