Again, DJI made that clear and that’s probably why they released two models. “Pro.” Words mean things.
Again, DJI made that clear and that’s probably why they released two models. “Pro.” Words mean things.
Then why in a post just yesterday, you are asking others if the 4K is an improvement over the M1? You can’t make the justification yourself? The capability and the adjustable aperature make the camera better than the M1. The M2P is capable in low light, the M1 isn’t. If that doesn’t justify it for you then this is a mute discussion.
You bashed the M1P when that came out and now you’re bashing the M2P.
Again, DJI made that clear and that’s probably why they released two models. “Pro.” Words mean things.
Ok, that’s your opinion. Then why are you on a Mavic 2 Pro forum section just bashing it. Return it or sell it and move along. Keeping it is just letting DJI win with your money and energy you keep putting into it.I just made the justification, see screeshot, the M2 is ****
Ok, that’s your opinion. Then why are you on a Mavic 2 Pro forum section just bashing it. Return it or sell it and move along. Keeping it is just letting DJI win with your money and energy you keep putting into it.
I’m not saying your wrong. I’m saying they released two models this year. During launch they specifically state modes from the Pro will require post production and provide tools to do so. Normal mode is there, other modes require post. What more info could you have wanted?I own a P3 Pro and Mavic Pro neither requiring post like the M2P.
In that specific set of images - the primary problem is that M2P image is out of focus and so it's not possible to draw any useful conclusions.
In that specific set of images - the primary problem is that M2P image is out of focus and so it's not possible to draw any useful conclusions.
Ouch!....yeah, just like in my video. Uggg....why DJI? Why???
Mavic 1 cannot produce footage like this. Resolution is one thing, actual detail is another.no I mean mavic 1 vs mavic 2
Ouch!....yeah, just like in my video. Uggg....why DJI? Why???
Cliff Totten.
Do you even own a Mavic 2?
The quality of the Mavic 2 is better than the Mavic 1. If you cant see that from all the videos on YouTube that compare the two, then go buy the drone you think is better or keep your Mavic 1. Go watch a low light footage video of the M2 pro on YouTube and try to do that with your Mavic 1, you can’t because the M1 has a fixed aperature. Case closed.
Mavic 1 cannot produce footage like this. Resolution is one thing, actual detail is another.
You’re right, I thought I mentioned the M1’s incapable sensor (in regards to low light). Fixed. Thanks for pointing it out and the clarification.I agree with you that the M2P is superior to the M1P in almost every respect, but how does a variable aperture make it better for low light footage if the widest aperture of the M2P is smaller (2.8) than the one in the M1P (2.2)? It's because of the photosite size and sensor technology that it is better.
Now, the one regard in which the M2P appears to fail miserably is FOV mode's resolving power, and only THERE it gets beaten by the M1P and lots of other cheaper cameras. It's not that EVERY reviewer is focusing all their cameras right except the M2P. Optical blurring does not cause aliasing, problems in sampling (skipping data) do. Still, taking colour science, dynamic range and so on, even at FOV the M2P offers many improvements over the M1P.
Majority of that video were Hyperlapses, they extracted the raw images, edited them in LR for the best dynamic range, imported to Premiere for Warp Stabilizer and BAM! But even the actual footage looked amazing. The original Mavic turned trees to watercolor mush and couldn’t see faces of people at a distance. The Mavic 2 improved at both.I might get this video editing down yet. I feel like I'm getting closer...of course that last video doesn't help my confidence any...
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.