The next trick is to figure out getting the right adaptors on the ends of the cable.no problem
The next trick is to figure out getting the right adaptors on the ends of the cable.no problem
Thanks chazz. You say when you were flying with the original motors - have you replaced them? I saw your flight out to 59000 with three protec 3600s (that's why I have 3 protec 3600s) . On that flight were you keeping your power below 80%? And were your motors warm or hot when your bird got back? I am thinking they might not get too hot while keeping your airspeed up but maybe it is more power related. But then again you had three batteries on where I only had two. Beanbubba has given me some ideas of how to keep from overheating the motors. What did mnoutdoors do with the rear covers?
Hi guys.Can i use this battery in my mavic pro?Everyone talks lihv batteries but no shipping int my country this battery.
Buy Products Online from China Wholesalers at Aliexpress.com
Roger that - Thanks
That is not exactly true.
. . . there is zero difference in performance by only using the left port versus both ports. There is one corner case for close range flying with lots of urban terrain (i.e. buildings/bridges/etc) where using both ports can take advantage of MIMO radio technology but I have never been able to measure any noticeable difference in any situation where the left port performed identically to both ports in use.
In all situations now I only use the left port in all my setups. I initially ran 2 coax up my tower with 2 panel antennas, this was before I discovered how the mavic radio system works. The second coax on my tower is now unplugged.
EDIT: if doing this all over again, I would run 2 coax up the tower. One to a high gain panel antenna, the other to a low gain omni antenna. Then I could swap the two cables in my shop when I want to not fly only in a straight line in one direction.
This is surprising to me. I have heard some people say that the left port is for drone control and the right port is for video. So I assume if you want a video signal you have to use the right port. Is this wrong?
That is not exactly true.
On both the AC and RC the left port is a TX/RX-combo port, and the right port is a RX-only port. We have exhausted this topic in the past and there is zero difference in performance by only using the left port versus both ports. There is one corner case for close range flying with lots of urban terrain (i.e. buildings/bridges/etc) where using both ports can take advantage of MIMO radio technology but I have never been able to measure any noticeable difference in any situation where the left port performed identically to both ports in use.
In all situations now I only use the left port in all my setups. I initially ran 2 coax up my tower with 2 panel antennas, this was before I discovered how the mavic radio system works. The second coax on my tower is now unplugged.
EDIT: if doing this all over again, I would run 2 coax up the tower. One to a high gain panel antenna, the other to a low gain omni antenna. Then I could swap the two cables in my shop when I want to not fly only in a straight line in one direction.
Hi Beanbubba, let me see if I am getting this correct since I fly my Mavic with amps in both sides of my RC with circular antennas, I can take off the right side amp and performance will be about the same? Is that correct? Thanks!
Have you guys seen this spark mod? It uses the balance cable only that connects inside the factory battery. I do not ever remember trying this method on the mavic. If so, did I miss the thread?
View attachment 37941
DJI SPARK MODIFIED SMART BATTERY INCLUDEDS FREE SHIPPING
The deafening silence tells me none of us have tried this mod method on the mavic. This looks promising to possibly use the mavic factory battery controller with external batteries combined with the factory battery cells. Anyone??
This is surprising to me. I have heard some people say that the left port is for drone control and the right port is for video. So I assume if you want a video signal you have to use the right port. Is this wrong?
That is a fair assessment and along what I was thinking. But why would the folks that did the spark mod not use the main power connector? It has me scratching my head.I'm not all that sure what's going on under the hood of that Spark battery but all I see 2 wires going to the balance connector. That tells me that he us using the balance leads to supply power to the main battery instead of the XT60. You have a positive and negative lead off the balance connector so you can draw from a batter this way. This might work with a Spark (not sure of the amperage pull of those motors) but even with those beefier wires, I wouldn't do this on a Mavic. Heck, the terminal ends on the balance connector are probably less conductive than the wires probably. Also, think about what gauge wire your balance connectors are and the amps you'll be pushing through them. Even if it worked well on a Mavic, I doubt it would see any measurable gains vs using XT60.
Ya got me. They could be soldering the leads on the balance taps on the battery board instead of the pos / neg taps on the battery. I don't know anything about the Spark or the Mavic Air. I guess that the amperage demand is much lower and the balance cable is sufficient for power delivery and saves a few grams in weight instead of XT60. But that difference is minimal. Really interesting the way he's doing it though. Seems like it's just a different method of delivering the power essentially the same way. I remember the old P3 battery mod a different vendor sold. He always insisted on connecting the balance lead and the XT60. But we found that there was no difference in behavior with it connected or not.That is a fair assessment and along what I was thinking. But why would the folks that did the spark mod not use the main power connector? It has me scratching my head.
They also have the same mod for the Air on their website.
Hey Guys,
So I Just got done testing this mod, and I wanted to let you know my results. I know that there is a lot of controversy over whether or not these actually work. In sport mode the batteries add about 4.3 minutes of flight time, while in regular flying the batteries add about 8.2 minutes of flight time even with the extra weight. It's not a huge difference but it can come in handy. I also like the way that the Mavic flys with the extra weight, it feels more stable. The mod I constructed above weighs around 176 grams in total. After about 2 hours of testing I have experienced no problems. I did a lot of research before testing this in the field and found that the extra power on the Mavics battery cells shouldn't affect it. My guess on how this works is that the LiPo batteries charge the Mavics smart battery while it is flying, as the remote doesn't read any extra mAh or volts, another reason I have for this theory is that the LiPo's can be used for three flights before they should be charged again. I am happy to answer any questions.
This is how I connected it.
I think you are right that it creates one big battery. I just did another test where I only had the LiPo batteries on and the mavics battery off this turned the drone on but the mavics battery did not show any signs of charging. The reason why I thought it charged the mavics battery was because I thought that the battery was charging when only the LiPo's were on, I saw wrong, my apologies. Another thing to note is that as expected the mavic will not connect to the controller unless the smart battery is turned on so when that is low the drone must land. This is probably the reason why the LiPo's can last three flights, due to the fact that the smart battery dies first.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.