Ren57
Well-Known Member
Nice picture and really, really clear. Did you take it? you've good a really good camera if you did.....Does this help? Note the lamp post identifier - it was taken two posts down from stop 10, where the video was shot.
Nice picture and really, really clear. Did you take it? you've good a really good camera if you did.....Does this help? Note the lamp post identifier - it was taken two posts down from stop 10, where the video was shot.
Nice picture and really, really clear. Did you take it? you've good a really good camera if you did.....
Ahhh, Fox News, the mother of professional high grade journalism, well than....All this "there was no drone" nonsense is completely ridiculous. And if you just went from not bothering to read the news at all to watching a "segment" on Fox News then the discussion is worthless.
Unfortunately about 30% of Americans will read your post and agree with you and not realize that you are... never mind...Ahhh, Fox News, the mother of professional high grade journalism, well than....
Sorry I just could not resist....
Now if you are a good conspiracy theorist you will ignore this and move on to something else; how do we know it was not a UFO comes to mind.Nice picture and really, really clear. Did you take it? you've good a really good camera if you did.....
Ahhh, Fox News, the mother of professional high grade journalism, well than....
Sorry I just could not resist....
Unfortunately about 30% of Americans will read your post and agree with you and not realize that you are... never mind...![]()
I don't want to appear pedantic but the picture you posted was of FLWO15 and the one in the video was FLWO12. So a couple of hundred yards further down the roadYes - from 5000 miles away it would have to be an exceptional camera. Google was my camera in this case.
I don't want to appear pedantic but the picture you posted was of FLWO15 and the one in the video was FLWO12. So a couple of hundred yards further down the roadStill, as you say, a great picture from 5000 miles away. And in any case, the last time I was there, that bus terminal was completely different. Ah, the speed of airport expansion is truly frightening.
Unfortunately a healthy dose of skepticism should be in the back of our minds when consuming reporting from most any news source nowadays. At least know what the source's biases are and take that into account.Or CNN
I think biased would be a better word. You know just like CNN, MSNBC and 90% of the newspapers still clinging on.Are you saying that Fox News is laughable?
Airport terrorists seems a bit extreme.
Having someone flying drones around the airport I'm trying to fly out of would not invoke any feelings of terror or fear. Annoyance, anger, and frustration maybe...
I think biased would be a better word. You know just like CNN, MSNBC and 90% of the newspapers still clinging on.
Does it seem odd that with hundreds to thousands of stranded travelers, not to mention a busy international airport, there are not dozens-hundreds of photos of this incursion? How is it that an airport of this size & traffic doesn’t have some sort of video system in place? I thought England was the capital of video capture? One crappy video so far? How many flights have been claimed so far? Wouldn’t the authorities have thought to set up monitoring after the first few?
How about this, the drone in the video is the authorities own in a flyover looking for evidence?
Breitbart...Okay - it was your word, not mine. What do you use as a news source?
Since you think this is made up, what is your theory as to why?Does it seem odd that with hundreds to thousands of stranded travelers, not to mention a busy international airport, there are not dozens-hundreds of photos of this incursion? How is it that an airport of this size & traffic doesn’t have some sort of video system in place? I thought England was the capital of video capture? One crappy video so far? How many flights have been claimed so far? Wouldn’t the authorities have thought to set up monitoring after the first few?
How about this, the drone in the video is the authorities own in a flyover looking for evidence?
Does it seem odd that with hundreds to thousands of stranded travelers, not to mention a busy international airport, there are not dozens-hundreds of photos of this incursion? How is it that an airport of this size & traffic doesn’t have some sort of video system in place? I thought England was the capital of video capture? One crappy video so far? How many flights have been claimed so far? Wouldn’t the authorities have thought to set up monitoring after the first few?
How about this, the drone in the video is the authorities own in a flyover looking for evidence?
Nothing but UFO's?I just drove through Roswell, NM the other night and didn’t see any drones there either.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.