John Locke
Well-Known Member
How do the two methods compare for end result? I haven't seen any significant improvements end result, assuming you're after realistic real world colors. Dlog doesn't look worse, but only slightly better from what I can tell. The comparisons from Tony and Chelsea don't seem very significant, but that's using YouTubes compression, which can affect things. What's your opinion of finish product quality? Does 10bit help much when you see it on your computer?Well, I typically color-grade my videos anyway. At the very least, I tweak the basic settings. So, I figured if I'm doing that, I may as well, shoot in D-Log. I'm usied to shooting HDR stills in photograph--been doing it for over 10 years, so the idea of high dynamic range in videography is very appealing to me.
Shooting in D-Log forces you to save in H.265 compression (well, on the Mavic 2 Pro, anyway). Most of my H.264 videos have not been in 4K, so I can't comment on comparing H.265 with non-4K videos. It's no skin off my teeth to shoot H.264 and if it give better compression, why not use it?![]()
I guess what I was hoping for is when I see a 10bit dlog video in 4k on YouTube, I will be able to say..... Oh yeah, that's done with a M2P in 4K 10Bit/Dlog, no question (versus 8bit 4K M.264 on P4P). But I can't say that's the case yet. Seems there's a lot of hype about the Hasselblad features, but I haven't been wowed yet (except the portability of course). Maybe I'm expecting too much.