Totally agree. I'm a "Big Data" IT guy, and I've seen how seemingly innocuous data can be put together to come up with sensitive information that is otherwise protected. I'm a little nervous about DJI collecting this data, but I'm not so nervous I won't fly. It's interesting, as I think about it. You mentioned bridges and other sensitive sites. While a whole bunch of us drone operators just fly around a nearby field, others often want to fly near points of interest. Bridges, railroads, tourist attractions, buildings, airports (with permission, of course). But there's another data point that we may not have considered. Places we are NOT allowed to fly. By finding holes in flight data, DJI can identify sensitive areas that they may not have in their database. A good example of this would be a TFR (temporary flight restriction). TFR's are established by the FAA when someone of importance is at a certain local or some event is taking place. By analyzing that data, they can start to build a map of expected movements and events that the government considers sensitive. That data can be invaluable for reasons I'll let you consider. This sort of data analysis is a very common practice. In some areas of conflicts, military drones can find areas of interest, for instance, by identifying areas where there is, for instance, a town or a compound, and there is NO electronic signature of cellphones or wifi. I won't ramble on anymore about this, but data collection is big business these days, and to ignore it or marginalize it could be a big mistake. From now on I'm wrapping my Mavic in tinfoil that matches my hat.