Just caught this and briefly read thru it. I'm kinda of on the fence with the self reporting system. Yeah, I get the penalty immunity clause, but I'm wondering if it's real purpose of it. It seems to ask a lot of questions concerning make, model, problem(pilot or mechanical). It sounds more of a collection for a database to take future action on. I get the safety factor, but I'm wondering if it's going to used to prohibit certain models or mfg's. I can see it being used as a "good tool" for the industry, but I wonder if there is any checks on the it's reporting for all the "wild" accusations out there also. I guess I'm just trying to figure out if this is really going to help or hurt the UAS industry on how and who will be collecting and persuing this information.
Last edited:
