- Joined
- Apr 15, 2017
- Messages
- 126
- Reactions
- 39
- Age
- 56
It wasn't 'Prop loss', the craft turned over mid flight and did not recover.If it was prop loss due to incorrect installation, which is the most common cause of these incidents, why would you expect DJI to meet the full cost (or even any of the cost), and why would that make it not a "proper camera platform"? Are you suggesting that they should always simply provide a free replacement if the cause of the event cannot be definitively determined? That would be nice, of course, but probably not a great business model.
(Also something I inspect every flight before start up)
Two members of the public watched it, no contact with anything, no bird attack, no falling props, it just flipped and fell into the dam.
DJI were unable to tell me what happened, and as the craft was lost, I was not able to recover it to find out either.
That is the reason for the 50:50 offer.
My comment regarding it not being a proper camera platform was in regards to not being able to to rely on the craft flying over places it can't be recovered from.
I trusted the Mavic for 7 months, but on a simple flight (approx 70 away and 46m up, forget for a moment it was over water) it fell from the sky. If it were over field, I'd be picking up scrap.
The whole point of having a drone is to get shots you can't get standing in one spot.
If you can't fly more than 70m away without loosing the craft to some mysterious failure, then it's not a great platform.
Ive ordered the replacement, but I can't use it for its intended purpose.... That being action shots of dirt bikes, rally cars and family holidays as I can't risk another total loss. This is my frustration!!