They may have identical purposes but their vastly different functions makes it an apples to oranges comparison.Not at all. The purpose is identical. Identification of the operator.
Last edited:
They may have identical purposes but their vastly different functions makes it an apples to oranges comparison.Not at all. The purpose is identical. Identification of the operator.
They may have identical purposes but vastly different functions makes it an apples to oranges comparison.
I added a “their” to make it more clear.I can't make any sense out of this statement.
I added a “their” to make it more clear.
If you can't see the difference in the privacy implications of a piece of metal with a random number on it attached to your car and a radio signal broadcasting your location to people that can't currently see you, then I'm not sure you're debating in good faith and worth going back and forth with. I'm outDoesn't really help.
How they function wasn't what was being discussed. The identifying capability is what we are debating, and that some here seem to have a big problem with with RID.
Kind of like when discussing transportation from A to B one notes that a sedan and a Bus are identical in achieving that end, and someone else comes along and says apples to oranges comparison because one runs on gasoline, the other on diesel. Irrelevant to the point being made.
I would have a big problem with RID if there were regular incidents of pilots being confronted by Karens, or thieves stealing their drones using RID. Since this isn't actually an issue, and there are no signs at all it's going to start to be, I'm as unconcerned about it as I am the license plate on my car.
A. Not in good faith.If you can't see the difference in the privacy implications of a piece of metal with a random number on it attached to your car and a radio signal broadcasting your location to people that can't currently see you, then I'm not sure you're debating in good faith and worth going back and forth with. I'm out![]()
Props to GadgetGuy, THANKYOU for your meticulous attention to detail. Your post has made me rethink purchasing an Air 3s. I now am considering a Mini 4 Pro. I think it's funny that you're using a more expensive piece of equipment than your Mini 5 Pro drone to detect for RID, and you single handedly forced DJI into admitting that they lied. This issue is important to people, that is why I read through your entire 7 page thread and I would like to make several points.Mini 5 Pro is Broadcasting RID with ALL Batteries in the U.S., Including the Mini 5 Pro Standard Batter
I am using the $1100 Dronetag RIDER
Like other people, I find it unlikely that the Mini 4 Pro detects small weight changes on takeoff to enable RID and it's much more likely to simply turn on RID after detecting the intelligent flight battery PLUS. With that being said, I know it's very possible for DJI to enable RID based on takeoff weight. These drones use very sensitive gyroscopes and sensors. Can you possibly tape a brick to a Mini 4 Pro and confirm it does not broadcast RID with your Dronetag RIDER, using the standard intelligent flight battery? Are there any reports of Mini 4 Pro users using the standard battery who are put over the 250g limit due to strobes, detecting RID signals? Regardless of what the "Fly App" claims?When the Mini 4 Pro's weight exceeds 250g (e.g., by adding a light or using the Plus battery), its internal Remote ID system will become active.
My Mini4P with the addition of strobe lights and a landing gear tops out at 261 grams. Does that mean I'm RID broadcasting all the time?
If you're operating within the rules and in a safe manner, you've got nothing to worry about. Including private parties using RID to find drone operators. The fears about Karens and thieves simply have not materialized.
This blatantly false. The reality is, fears about sub 250 gram drones causing accidents have not materialized. You have no data to back your position. To the contrary, there are multiple examples of people flying drones operating within the law who are being harassed. If a drone was bothering me, I would download a drone detection app and track that person down. There are millions of people like me, the only difference being most of them don't know about drone detection apps YET because we are still on the frontier of drone technology. That is no reason to not have foresight, I see where this RID technology is going.The fears about identifying and finding and ultimately stopping bad actors have not materialized.
BossBob is correct. In America it's illegal to make anyone's license plate information public for obvious reasons. Making a license plate equivalency is illogical. Let me be clear, AFTER WHAT THOMAS CROOKS DID with a DJI drone broadcasting RID, I have no tolerance for any arguments of why my privacy should be invaded using a SUB 250 GRAM DRONE flying for recreation.But having a licence plate number in the UK doesn’t give away the registered keepers details to any old Tom,**** or Karen, whereas RID will. Probably breaks UK data protection regulations in some way.
I do agree with you, but I will point out that the original Mavic Mini can detect the extra weight of the prop guards and imposes a lower max altitude.Like other people, I find it unlikely that the Mini 4 Pro detects small weight changes on takeoff to enable RID and it's much more likely to simply turn on RID after detecting the intelligent flight battery PLUS.
Yes that says everything, we simply don't know how DSI's systems operate without tests. Obviously these drones can detect small weight changes, they have to compensate for wind and remain aerodynamic. DSI's manuals cannot be trusted, their representatives cannot be trusted. I'm even considering Potensic at this point with how dishonest DSI is, Potensic broadcasts RID regardless of weight but at least they are honest about it. Why can't DSI simply commit to guaranteeing US consumers firmware updates in 2026 if legally possible? They are giving all the signals of abandoning us.I do agree with you, but I will point out that the original Mavic Mini can detect the extra weight of the prop guards and imposes a lower max altitude.
The original poster forced DJI into admitting that they lied when their manual originally claimed no remote ID for non plus batteries on the Mini 5 Pro. DJI without announcement changed their manuals to reflect that ALL Air 5s broadcast remote ID regardless of which battery you're using. They scammed as many people as they could into believing they were getting a mini drone below 250 grams without RID, and it wasn't a mistake because you don't spend millions on product development and forget to update your manual.I can positivlely confirm after testing the mini 5 pro with the standard battery -- RID is bring transmitted. That's an affirmative.
A friend of mine purchased a mini 5 pro, he just got his 107. Fearing that he would not be able to fly without a RID module, we did some testing with a few different RID trackers, the mini 5 was transmitting RID.
This made my friend pretty happy, as he didn't have to buy new + batteries. I'm sure some people will not be happy about this!
He has all the latest firmware and fly app on iPhone as of Thanksgiving 2025.
So if you're wondering, as we were about this subject, that's the answer.
^ Waiting on Firmware update to remove it. If you want RID buy and put on a fricken external module....
That is what all the testing so far has indicatedSo it is January of 2026, are we locked in that RID is on with both standard and the extended types with no way of turning off?
As to (2.), since DJI is deliberately not selling the Mini 5 Pro in the U.S., why have DJI gone to such great lengths to comply with the FAA requirements for drone manufacturers who are selling in the U.S, and obtained FAA approval, and are now forcing RID broadcasting when they are not required to do so, because the Mini 5 Pro is not being sold by them in the U.S. as a drone manufacturer., nor supported?Not going to happen. Two reasons:
- Most important, there is no margin in FAA regs to allow for manufacturing variation in weight, like in the European regs. As the M5P has no way to measure its weight, DJI simply cannot allow for an M5P with the standard battery that weighs a hair over 250g to not broadcast RID. Since the manufacturing variability problem is real, this will preclude DJI from ever turning off RID.
- Less important but still very real, the US is not a market for the M5P, and a very small number of customers compared to the rest of the world. DJI has little to no incentive to support the needs of US customers with this product, and is unlikely the waste any resources meeting our needs. In fact, they're doing everything they can to discourage US customers from buying one.
Yup. It isn't a true Mini!So it is January of 2026, are we locked in that RID is on with both standard and the extended types with no way of turning off?
Not just the all the testing, but the updated User Manual from October 2025, and all DJI Support communication are now very clear and unambiguous that the Mini 5 Pro broadcasts RID with every battery type inserted, regardless of total weight.That is what all the testing so far has indicated
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.