NoGo ahead and read "The Hundred Year Marathon" and then review that statement.
NoGo ahead and read "The Hundred Year Marathon" and then review that statement.
Exactly the the trillions upon trillions of bits and bytes would be monumental and totally unusable to try to glean out any useful info... absurd... just another scare tactic that this govt uses to keep the populace under their control...0200 Beijing time. Sirens go off in a Chinese bunker. The crew scrambles from their beds and gathers quickly in the central command room.
A message pops up on an overly large screen.
Downloading Sensitive Flight Data...
95% Completed
100% Completed
Generating report... Done.
The personnel clenches their cheeks, ready for the worst. Finally, a computerized AI voice announces through a loudspeaker:
"Declare national emergency. Joe has crashed his Syma in the backyard again."
Just like the UK, paranoid press cook up fantastic story's about drones spying on every thing and everyone.. HA HA welcome to 1984.. bring it on..Oh man! I'm threatening US national security by giving away data to China. Soon they'll know all the best places to shoot sunsets over the deserts, mountains and lakes near me. I suppose this is a more legit concern for flyers who aren't hobbyists like me. I'm sure the media will have a heyday though. Must be Monday.
Exactly the the trillions upon trillions of bits and bytes would be monumental and totally unusable to try to glean out any useful info... absurd... just another scare tactic that this govt uses to keep the populace under their control...
I think this is a prime example of the naivety that I'm talking about. I think it's safe to say that you have no idea of the methods at their disposal to home in on anything that might be of interest to them - of which are made available through their products and subsequent exposure in foreign countries. You also don't have any idea of what they might be looking for - something seemingly innocent could be indicative of some larger event of interest two or three times removed.Exactly the the trillions upon trillions of bits and bytes would be monumental and totally unusable to try to glean out any useful info... absurd... just another scare tactic that this govt uses to keep the populace under their control...
LOL, then perhaps the USA should quit being the 800 pound rabid gorilla stomping on anything not acquiescing instantly to any whim or demand of its protected corporations.
Then the world will stop building 800 pound gorilla missiles.
Reality is countries government arm against the biggest most dangerous aggressor... and the entire world has.
Yup I agree, this is all part of the trade war dust. Things are opening up for trade with Japan now, I wonder if they have any decent drones?
A lot of the responses in this thread show very little brain power being applied to consider the issue.What is crap? Please explain. Who's to know whether you agree with the author and are stating that DJI's behavior is crap or that the article is crap. I would assume the latter. If so, what about the article is "crap".
I think everyone that is dismissive about security risks from DJI, their product, and their involvement in the US are being naive. Rationalizing it as "look at all of the other data collection activities by other IT companies" and "who cares about my pictures/videos" doesn't excuse risk associated with DJI and their products. If I were a foreign government, I would LOVE to have the product deployment and general access into another country that DJI has. It's a no-brainer.
If there really was any cybersecurity concern (I don't believe there is), flying in atti mode wouldn't make a shred of difference.I agree, being a relative neophyte with DJI smart drones as well, the only way I believe to prevent the data is to fly in ATTI mode which doesn't use the sensors and doesn't need the DJI application. Basically fly only using the controller in sport mode. This is not easy for a beginner since it requires advanced RC piloting skills similar to trying to fly an RC helicopter. Another option is to use a dumb drone with barometric sensors for altitude hold and GPS for position hold in wind.
From a different POV (Norway), - the DHS initiative against DJI, - not to mention the ban of Huawei products, - is nothing less than parts of the trade war between USA and China. Sorry for that!
The Chinese government and its corporations don't have the same divide ours do in the US.
It's going to be hard given how 99.9% of population doesn't even know what a TCP stack is.
A lot of the responses in this thread show very little brain power being applied to consider the issue.
If you want to take this seriously, there are several points you need to think about a bit more.
1. There's a big assumption that DJI is somehow getting your photos and videos. - They aren't.
2. Who really thinks that anything they have photographed or shot video of is going to be of any strategic importance to anyone? Really?
Just look through a few hundred pix and videos here: Dronestagram | The #1 drone photography platform to get an idea how ridiculous the idea is.
3. Can you imagine being DJI's spymaster and going through al the millions of photos and videos looking for something of value? How much wasted time and effort would that take?
4. If China is really interested in seeing things in your area, they can send agents posing as tourists and visit the areas themselves.
They could fly their own drones, focusing on what they are really interested in or fly light aircraft to get good views.
Looking at a million random photos of things they have no interest in on the chance that someone has good imagery of something of strategic interest is laughable.
5. The vague DHS warning says that Chinese drones could steal valuable personal data. What valuable personal data does your drone have access to?
Why doesn't the DHS warn about Chinese made phones which have access to much more data than your drone does?
That's a good question, what do you think?How much would you speculate the Chinese government influences, runs or interferes with most Chinese companies?
My understanding is that American companies in China are forced to partner with Chinese companies and share (give up) intellectual property in order to gain access to the Chinese market. And they do it. I would expect the Chinese to exert as much control as they can get away with.Do American owned companies with Chinese facilities have a degree of autonomy?
1. Image and video files are very large.1. Says who?
2. Missing the point. It's not about any one person.
Samsung deepfake AI could fabricate a video of you from a single profile pic
Even the Mona Lisa can be faked.www.cnet.com
If you want to take this seriously(...)
And yet nobody has seen any proof of those "risks" existing. See, that's what I'm talking about, people blindly beleive things without even asking for proof, let alone verifying it.Their products were banned by the US Government for security risks.
The Chinese government and its corporations don't have the same divide ours do in the US.
PLEASE let it be so!
Kyosho, Futaba, JR just to name a few.
Kyosho made the G-ZERO which was pretty cool.
Was basically a Drone that Hovered at a metre orso, and you used
a surface Tx to control it.
The point and shoot control system was interesting
There was even a FPV kit that went on your controller.
which you could then put on your RC car. Out of the box, if nothing else.
PS: Did Thunderdrones just give a thumbsup to China not being our friend ?
View attachment 73523View attachment 73523
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.