Pro v air footage

[Whack]

Not sure if this has been posted already but nice comparison between the two

Much prefere the camera on the air.

 

[Qoncussion]

Definitely one of the better comparison videos so far...

 

[Espen W]

Thanks for the link!
I wonder of the more recessed position of the camera/gimbal on the Air acts sort of like an aftermarket lens hood on a Pro? Ie. limits direct sun light from certain angles to cut down on glare, etc.

 

[Kilrah]

Maybe a bit, but as a counterpart you lose some gimbal movement range and thus speed/agility.

 

[Espen W]

Yup.
I'm wondering if the more shielded/shaded camera location on the Air is the cause of the crisper image rather than the camera itself.
In other words, when both birds are set up manually, with proper settings (and/or filters or hoods) we might not see such a difference?

 

[Kilrah]

No.

 

[Whack]

Yup.
I'm wondering if the more shielded/shaded camera location on the Air is the cause of the crisper image rather than the camera itself.
In other words, when both birds are set up manually, with proper settings (and/or filters or hoods) we might not see such a difference?

Very possibly but I suppose part of the attraction of the Air is the ability to get good quality images by default with a very portable package!

 

[Whack]

Another nice comparison between footage from dji drones