I hate to say it, but the image quality on the Mavic is getting really outdated.
Has anyone heard anything about Mavic 2???
"Outdated" because the camera quality is crappy and there are severe artifacts with even the slightest movement, like filming a waterfall. The bit rate is not sufficient.
Really? Let's see some of your footage of moving water, e.g. waterfalls. You obviously have no idea what you're talking about.You may want to use an ND filter with the proper settings. I've never had an issue with artifacts nor do I see a lot of posts about this being an issue. I've seen some great footage from a Mavic. Bit rate is 60 v 100. Not outdated at all. Very little difference between the two.
If you were expecting great camera quality from the Mavic, you bought the wrong drone. It's not that the Mavic Pro is outdated.
Actually I was.If you were expecting great camera quality from the Mavic, you bought the wrong drone. It's not that the Mavic Pro is outdated.
Really? Let's see some of your footage of moving water, e.g. waterfalls. You obviously have no idea what you're talking about.
The camera is puny, they can make it bigger and better. Go away with your mediocrity.
Water is fine as long as the drone isn't moving. If the drone was moving at a significant speed, most of those shots would look terrible. And waterfalls are usually even worse.Not mine, but here is the 2nd video that I came across on a YT search showing footage of water with the Mavic Pro:
I'm not currently on a great monitor but I don't see any issues with the footage.
The P4 has a better camera and also has 100mbps bit rate. It was out before the Mavic Pro so if you think 60 is too low.... you bought the wrong drone. I'm not saying that the Mavic is not a great drone but it is obviously not the best non-commercial drone DJI makes as far as the camera is concerned.
The drone was moving on all of those shots. I did not see any pixilation. The shots looked good to me.Water is fine as long as the drone isn't moving. If the drone was moving at a significant speed, most of those shots would look terrible. And waterfalls are usually even worse.
Yes, thank you.
Now that's what I'm talking about...be safe fly safeCan’t believe people are still waiting for the Mavic 2. Do what I did just buy a inspire.
This thread is more outdated than the Mavic's camera is.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.