Great article and I love the AI-generated image! There's a protestor with a sign which says "Privacy NOW"
It's all part of the anti-Chinese hoax. There was never any indication and for sure no evidence that DJI ever transferred anything to the Chinese government. Currently, I'd trust the Chinese long before our current administration.
There literally has been no evidence provided to justify the US Customs embargo based on the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act. Zero. Nothing. Nor is there any evidence that our DJI drones are a threat to national security and are reporting back to the CCCP mothership. But the lack of any evidence didn't stop Elise Stefanik (R-NY) and John Moolenaar (R-MI) from pushing the upcoming ban through Congress via the 2025 NDAA. And not directing a specific government agency to do the investigation made the ban a done deal.That’s laughable.
They may have "evidence" they just probably haven't shared it with the public. When you figure out the enemy is spying on you then you generally don't release the details to the public since it might give away some of the sources or the methods.There literally has been no evidence provided to justify the US Customs embargo based on the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act. Zero. Nothing. Nor is there any evidence that our DJI drones are a threat to national security and are reporting back to the CCCP mothership. But the lack of any evidence didn't stop Elise Stefanik (R-NY) and John Moolenaar (R-MI) from pushing the upcoming ban through Congress via the 2025 NDAA. And not directing a specific government agency to do the investigation made the ban a done deal.
But we can all guess why you would think that this is all a big joke.

If you are serious, you don't reveal anything about another country spying on you, because that informs the other country's spy service that they were detected. You don't want the enemy to know you are on to their spying. I would argue that the only reason the US frequently makes public announcement about Chinese spying is to stoke anti-China fear. It has little or nothing to do with national security.When you figure out the enemy is spying on you then you generally don't release the details to the public since it might give away some of the sources or the methods.
Yep, you don't but it probably got out or leaked that we were on to them. Decided to go ahead and acknowledge it without giving up the details. But I agree, sounds more like anti-China fear but I'm not so sure that was a thing with the previous administration when this all first came up; honestly I don't remember.If you are serious, you don't reveal anything about another country spying on you, because that informs the other country's spy service that they were detected. You don't want the enemy to know you are on to their spying. I would argue that the only reason the US frequently makes public announcement about Chinese spying is to stoke anti-China fear. It has little or nothing to do with national security.
It's all part of the anti-Chinese hoax. There was never any indication and for sure no evidence that DJI ever transferred anything to the Chinese government. Currently, I'd trust the Chinese long before our current administration.
There literally has been no evidence provided to justify the US Customs embargo based on the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act. Zero. Nothing. Nor is there any evidence that our DJI drones are a threat to national security and are reporting back to the CCCP mothership. But the lack of any evidence didn't stop Elise Stefanik (R-NY) and John Moolenaar (R-MI) from pushing the upcoming ban through Congress via the 2025 NDAA. And not directing a specific government agency to do the investigation made the ban a done deal.
But we can all guess why you would think that this is all a big joke.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.