Seems like the chairman is making a blanket statement about the risks of doing business wiith China. This does nothing but reinforce my point that the Chinese are in it for themselves, their country, and not the United States.
a bigger world now... no arguments with these statements, but who wears the white hat is purely a point of view decision. Another country can get the same Google info by hacking their free use or subcategory membership purchase.
Yes the Web is the Web, and that's a little bit scary for defense providers. The problem so far has been that instead of proactive, the USA has been reactive in responding to foreign cyber threats. The United States army's decision to wipe all its computers clean of DJi software was a reaction after a threat was detected. The general's action is proactive saying that he urges caution in doing what Google is doing in China.
It seems that you've started with this assumption and let things run away from there.
What gives or doesnt give you comfort is a personal choice, but it gives me comfort.
Seems like you've stated an assumption as well. I stuck to the facts, cited news articles, and shown proof of DJIs intent to access unauthorized data from the US Army. Whether or not the issue has been "corrected" , which is what most of post 31 is referring to, is irrelevant. The spyware was there without permission and it caused an immediate response by the Army.
I've started with a good understanding of what's on my flying tablet and how little access DJI has to it.
