Welcome Mavic Pilot!
Jump in and join our free DJI Mavic community today!
Sign up

Why 2.7K is the best. (for me)

rossmoney

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2017
Messages
144
Reaction score
201
Age
31
Hey All!
Here is a quick Apple based visual aid of their resolutions including the Mavic Pro and the Mavic 2 Pro.
Highlighted in red are the ones I use most frequently.
I film in 2.7k because I rarely crop my footage.
Also, it saves SO much space shooting in a lower resolution.
As most people (0ver 60%) view the internet on their mobile devices these days, I feels it's okay to shoot in a lower res.
What are your thoughts? would love to hear feedback.

-Ross


Photo Dimensions_New.jpg
 

Thomas B

Moderator
Staff Member
Premium Pilot
Joined
Jan 25, 2019
Messages
6,152
Reaction score
4,188
Location
Gilbert, Arizona
I agree with your premise and assumptions and the size of files does increase exponentially in practice. However, the viewing device must be considered (as you did). I shoot the highest resolution I can get when I’m going to display the file on my 60” TV.
 

rossmoney

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2017
Messages
144
Reaction score
201
Age
31
I agree with your premise and assumptions and the size of files does increase exponentially in practice. However, the viewing device must be considered (as you did). I shoot the highest resolution I can get when I’m going to display the file on my 60” TV.
You must have a 4K tv then... I can only wish..
I live in a tiny home :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sharpie

Thomas B

Moderator
Staff Member
Premium Pilot
Joined
Jan 25, 2019
Messages
6,152
Reaction score
4,188
Location
Gilbert, Arizona
No, it’s a 7 y/o plasma with an emulator... it doesn’t use pixels since it’s plasma... but that’s for another forum.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rossmoney

guigen

Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2018
Messages
5
Reaction score
9
Age
29
What are your thoughts? would love to hear feedback.

-Ross


View attachment 62333
Another advantage for shooting in 2.7K on the Mavic 2 Pro, is it can provide the ability to shoot at 60fps frame rate. Allows a bit of flexibility if you want to slow the footage down a little. Although this will mean you will be again using more storage space if that’s what you’re concerned with.

TIP Want to watch a ‘Slow-mo’ preview of your footage on a Mac using QuickTime?
Use this keyboard shortcut: while the clip is playing, hold down K+L
 

Thomas B

Moderator
Staff Member
Premium Pilot
Joined
Jan 25, 2019
Messages
6,152
Reaction score
4,188
Location
Gilbert, Arizona
Frame rates are available on the Platinum also up to 1000’s... iso 100 and frame rate of 50 or 60 will seem more realistic due to motion blur. May need filters to stop down on a bright day. Point is that the slower frame rate is visually more pleasing to most. It can be viewed slower also. If you intend to use slo-mo shoot at higher frame rate to accomplish the task suggested.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rossmoney

Drone on

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2017
Messages
853
Reaction score
461
On the MP1, 2.7K has less noise than 4K.
2.7K is a sharp image.
I bounce back and forth trying various resolutions and frame rates.
I would definitely use 2.7K with 60 fps for the sharp smoothness. Right now, I'm using 1080p with 60 fps as that is the only resolution with 60fps on the MP1.
1080p is ok. obviously it's not as detailed, but I think it looks more natural.
 

Sarcastic1

Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2018
Messages
21
Reaction score
14
Location
Peoria, Arizona
Another advantage for shooting in 2.7K on the Mavic 2 Pro, is it can provide the ability to shoot at 60fps frame rate. Allows a bit of flexibility if you want to slow the footage down a little. Although this will mean you will be again using more storage space if that’s what you’re concerned with.

TIP Want to watch a ‘Slow-mo’ preview of your footage on a Mac using QuickTime?
Use this keyboard shortcut: while the clip is playing, hold down K+L

This is why I've been using 2.7k for video. In case I want to have some good slow motion, 60fps is handy. Plus, I doubt most people, if any can actually tell the difference between a 2.7k and a 4k video.

I'm sure I could do just fine using 1080p and an even higher frame rate but I'm a tech geek, so the higher number is the better to use, right? :)
 

Mr. Salty

Well-Known Member
Premium Pilot
Joined
Jun 7, 2017
Messages
1,790
Reaction score
2,079
Location
Iowa
What I like about shooting in 4K is the cushion it gives me to be able to crop in and zoom during editing and still maintain quality when outputting to 1080p.
 

Sportivod

Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2018
Messages
20
Reaction score
14
Age
46
It all depends on what your final delivery is to be. For everyday, hobbyist use then whatever resolution works in your workflow is the right resolution to use. However, if you are shooting with professional or possibly broadcast intentions, it's worth considering the technical aspects of the different resolutions as shot by the M2P, as that may prove critical to how you can use your footage. The M2P is the ONLY consumer level drone that shoots true broadcast acceptable footage. Not even the P4Pv2 does that. The combination of 4K, H.265, 10bit, 1" sensor and 100mbps bitrate is what makes the M2P broadcast standard across the world - no other drone below Inspire level offers that. So for those uses, you must shoot in 4K with DLog-M.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: rossmoney

Jason_sturgess

Active Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2019
Messages
33
Reaction score
46
From my experience ! Cropped 4K footage downscaled to 1080p looks a million times better than the Stardard 2.7k footage. In fact to my eyes the 2.7kfootage looks terrible & I never use it.
 

rossmoney

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2017
Messages
144
Reaction score
201
Age
31
From my experience ! Cropped 4K footage downscaled to 1080p looks a million times better than the Stardard 2.7k footage. In fact to my eyes the 2.7kfootage looks terrible & I never use it.
really good to know! Which version of 4k do you typically shoot in?
 

Slot Tech

Active Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2018
Messages
34
Reaction score
5
Age
49
I shoot everything in 2.7 60 fps. I have tried shooting in 4k but dont really see a difference when I downsize it to 1080 for you tube. I even mix some of my phantom 3 pro stuff at 1080 60 fps into my videos. I have the phantom 3 pro, phantom 4 obsidian and the mavic 2 pro. I use all at 60 fps
 

Jason_sturgess

Active Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2019
Messages
33
Reaction score
46
really good to know! Which version of 4k do you typically shoot in?
I don’t use the zoomed in option I hate it! Main reason is it tricks you in to thinking you’re Drone is closer to where it is so I keep it on the wide option & not the zoomed in HD.
 

Roamer105

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2016
Messages
324
Reaction score
197
Location
Dammeron Valley, UT 84783
I don’t use the zoomed in option I hate it! Main reason is it tricks you in to thinking you’re Drone is closer to where it is so I keep it on the wide option & not the zoomed in HD.
Actually the "zoomed in" (HQ) version is much closer to "natural perspective" (which means what you see with your unaided eyes at the very same location). Also, for almost all of my shots I had no need to correct for barrel distortion when using HQ mode.

I rarely use Full FOV - definitively not for scenery unless I am in close quarters and would like to have a bit of "wide angle" perspective.
 
  • Like
Reactions: parkgt

Jason_sturgess

Active Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2019
Messages
33
Reaction score
46
Actually the "zoomed in" (HQ) version is much closer to "natural perspective" (which means what you see with your unaided eyes at the very same location). Also, for almost all of my shots I had no need to correct for barrel distortion when using HQ mode.

I rarely use Full FOV - definitively not for scenery unless I am in close quarters and would like to have a bit of "wide angle" perspective.
To my eyes the HQ mode looks like a zoomed in perspective! I like the look of the wide view more From looking around the net looks like a lot of people feel the same as most vids I’ve seen are filmed in FOV , for example to get a full view of a castle in HQ you would have to be a good 600ft away from it ! That’s a pain the in ***, when with FOV you can be 200ft away & get the whole view. Just a personal view but I prefer the FOV mode over the HQ
 

Jason_sturgess

Active Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2019
Messages
33
Reaction score
46
I always shoot at FOV 4K 30FPS & use polarpro ND16 / 32 & shutter is at 1/60 I will adjust the F stop to get the right exposure from F2.8 - F8
 
  • Like
Reactions: rossmoney

Roamer105

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2016
Messages
324
Reaction score
197
Location
Dammeron Valley, UT 84783
To my eyes the HQ mode looks like a zoomed in perspective! I like the look of the wide view more From looking around the net looks like a lot of people feel the same as most vids I’ve seen are filmed in FOV , for example to get a full view of a castle in HQ you would have to be a good 600ft away from it ! That’s a pain the in ***, when with FOV you can be 200ft away & get the whole view. Just a personal view but I prefer the FOV mode over the HQ
I agree with your example since when you focus on something like a castle the distant scenery is less important and the distance distortion resulting from wide angle is likely desirable. That is an example of what I meant with "close quarters" and I would choose FOV as well. I have a number of videos on my YouTube channel (Roamer105) shot in HQ where I am certain that some of them you may not expect to be shot in HQ.
 
All E RC Mavic Drones

New Threads

Forum statistics

Threads
72,041
Messages
835,015
Members
99,084
Latest member
Ashdyer