Classic flyer
Well-Known Member
People flying responsibly would not be effectedWhatever would potentially be done needs to enforce personal responsibility and not blanket restrictions on the people who follow guidelines for flying.
People flying responsibly would not be effectedWhatever would potentially be done needs to enforce personal responsibility and not blanket restrictions on the people who follow guidelines for flying.
Anyone who claims ignorance of the law should mention that to a judge and see how that works out.I agree however people need to be involved enough with flying to be motivated to research the local and federal regulations if they are "confused"...ignorance is no excuse
Thank you sirAnyone who claims ignorance of the law should mention that to a judge and see how that works out.
Here's a thought...in Florida if you get busted for boating under the influence it goes against your drivers license...maybe the same should be done for drone pilots violating restricted airspace...what do you think?
That being said it would put "LEAD IN THE PENCIL" so to speakFirst, not the same thing.
BUI is only _considered_ when getting a DUI charge and the other way around. A BUI is not a charge directly against your license.
Rgardless, flying a drone and person's drivers license have no correlation.
Seems expensive to manage. NO seems not so much expense. That's probably the way it will go for now, NO.Here's my thoughts. I don't ***** about something unless I'm going to contribute to a solution.
1. Logable hours minimum with no blatant missteps. Present flight logs for verification.
2. Age restriction.
3. Designate periods or dates of the year. If more sign up and are approved than the agreed number of drones, have a drawing. On these days make it known that drones in limited amounts will be flying. If people still attend, they have no beef.
4. Present flight log to get back a security deposit.
Seems like it could work.
Enforcement would been an impossible issue. We can’t stop speeders, texting while driving, etc. Other than in limited areas where there is enough labor to work on this, I just can’t see how this would work.Here's a thought...in Florida if you get busted for boating under the influence it goes against your drivers license...maybe the same should be done for drone pilots violating restricted airspace...what do you think?
You are probably right. Privatize the program and kick back to parks would erase any expense and give to the park system.Seems expensive to manage. NO seems not so much expense. That's probably the way it will go for now, NO.
If you let the government choose the areas, I can almost guarantee it would be worse than that.That wouldn't solve anything, because such areas would almost surely be away from the popular parts of the parks, away from the sorts of areas drone pilots would want to fly.
Much like anything else when you get busted you pay the price for your indiscretionEnforcement would been an impossible issue. We can’t stop speeders, texting while driving, etc. Other than in limited areas where there is enough labor to work on this, I just can’t see how this would work.
True thatIf you let the government choose the areas, I can almost guarantee it would be worse than that.
I fully understand that, but how does that then carry over to Great Basin or Zion or any other NP? Our machines occasionally cause problems in our environment. Motorcycles, cars, trucks and snowmobiles cause untold more destruction and problems than a drone might ever cause. I can cite many instance of snowmobiles (or motorcycles) killing wildlife, but was there a national-wide ban implemented after the first one?To my knowledge, these motorcycles haven't crashed into the Grand Prismatic Spring in Yellowstone. That's what prompted the ban.
From my five decade perspective, I would second that.If you let the government choose the areas, I can almost guarantee it would be worse than that.
There's a simple reason this idea is DOA.. the last thing the NPS needs right now is to have to dedicate resources that are being taken away from them to a process that will benefit a very small minority of their visitors and be a nuisance to everyone else (i.e. their source of income). Let them live.
I couldn't agree more sir however the old adage still stands true..."a few bad apples spoil the bunch"What dedicated resources? What is being taken from them?
Silly me - I thought the National Park System was for the benefit of all and literally property of all US citizens.
Some folks seem to believe in elitism or pleasing the majority at the expense of the minority.
There also tends to be a disparaging of humanity in general when in fact people should be granted benefit of the doubt until they demonstrate their stupidity.
My take is that something should be worked out because an outright ban is wrong.
I fully understand that, but how does that then carry over to Great Basin or Zion or any other NP? Our machines occasionally cause problems in our environment. Motorcycles, cars, trucks and snowmobiles cause untold more destruction and problems than a drone might ever cause. I can cite many instance of snowmobiles (or motorcycles) killing wildlife, but was there a national-wide ban implemented after the first one?
It's still wrong to convict before the crime. I'd like to avoid a "Minority Report" styled future.I couldn't agree more sir however the old adage still stands true..."a few bad apples spoil the bunch"
Yes sirIt's still wrong to convict before the crime. I'd like to avoid a "Minority Report" styled future.
Why do you always talk about drones as if there would only be one? In the popular areas at popular times I imagine it might be dozens.I would say people on a trail, or climbing, is more disruptive than a small drone flying at 100m.
I gotta tell ya that when I flying my MP I've never seen anyone else flying one...just sayingWhy do you always talk about drones as if there would only be one? In the popular areas at popular times I imagine it might be dozens.
And why aren't we adding ATVs to this allowance? And how about fireworks? And skeet shooting? These are all groups that are dying to be allowed to use National Parks.
Can't we just have a few peaceful places where people can escape all of this?
And for the interest of people that might think I'm putting out a Canadian perspective, please keep in mind that I'm a dual citizen, divide my time between both countries, and vote in both. And I'm commercially certified in both.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.