Based on the price it’s obviously meant to compete with the Mavic Air, and possibly compete as an upgrade for those looking at a Spark. The Air also can’t do 4K/60. In fact, it looks like it may have the same sensor as the Air. At that price, it’s pretty attractive, but for the apparent lack of obstacle avoidance.No 4K 60fps...I’ll pass.
How is this a "rip off"? Most of the parts are quite different. Is it a rip off because it has propellers or because it folds?
It's not a rip off.
At $500, this will take the air of Mavic Air and will give the mavic pro a run for itss money.
I love IT!!!
Is that all you got??
No, I haven’t got it yet. I have only managed to get 3 M2pros and 2 M2zs.
It is either not released in this market or is on backorder or a waiting for the Pro version.
I think Xiaomi is not constrained by technology. if you look at their latest offering in phones its pretty much up there:While the price is right, it is right for what you get and that is far less than most/all DJI products. Mainly, there is no collision avoidance on their drone. If someone wants to save $150 for no collision avoidance, more power to them. Personally, I think they would be giving up a lot. It takes a _lot_ of processing power for a drone to map its surroundings and run several cameras to maintain collision avoidance. They a years of catching up in order to offer a product that DJI already offers. I'm sure DJI already has a ton of tech sitting around to release once their sales start to slow.
Well... if you think this way, let's say if cars had just come on the market in the last 6 years then suddenly Honda comes out with an SUV, say the Pilot. Then 2 years later we suddenly see a new company called Toyota appear, and they launch their new product, the Highlander! What would that be like? You see them on the road now, yet you don't think... Total Rip Off, or Totally Copied, do you?
Well... if you think this way, let's say if cars had just come on the market in the last 6 years then suddenly Honda comes out with an SUV, say the Pilot. Then 2 years later we suddenly a new company called Toyota and they launch their new product, the Highlander! What would that be like? You see them on the road now, yet you don't think... Total Rip Off, or Totally Copied, do you?
Therefore there is no real difference here either. A design evolves, like a car or truck or SUV and there are the basics in the formula. Then, other manufacturers use the same design concepts to create their own versions. Hundai and Kia were not around many years ago, but now they are everywhere (there must be a nest somewhere) and no one is thinking Total Rip Off or Total Copy, so we just have to get used to the idea that when a particular formula is arrived at, for a flying machine that has some create features, that will be the way all things of that nature will evolve.
We don't think off Boeing and Airbus being companies that are ripping off each other, so why do we keep thinking that about a drone manufacturer? Just some food for thought that I'd like to put out there, about the way the future of drone design is going and the new manufacturers that are yet to emerge on the market.
Shady trees, walls and even big hats work well.here's my question for all these craft - how is it possible to fly viewing a phone or even an iPad screen? When I try to take a photo using my phone or iPad in even moderately bright sunlight, the screen is very difficult to see, certainly not much detail. I can't imagine flying this way other than with a towel over my head to keep the light out.
Thanks for pointing out no avoidance system. As I read all the marketing material I completely missed that. It looks like a heck of a deal to me. I am still rookie till June, this looks like the perfect upgrade for my wife she has a Tello. I jumped in with both feet and bought MPP about 4 to 6 weeks before the latest Mavic release. Kind of glad I did not buy the latest MP2 edition. Last thing I need to be as a newbie is real life testing owner. Thanks again guess I will pass on this drone for now.While the price is right, it is right for what you get and that is far less than most/all DJI products. Mainly, there is no collision avoidance on their drone. If someone wants to save $150 for no collision avoidance, more power to them. Personally, I think they would be giving up a lot. It takes a _lot_ of processing power for a drone to map its surroundings and run several cameras to maintain collision avoidance. They a years of catching up in order to offer a product that DJI already offers. I'm sure DJI already has a ton of tech sitting around to release once their sales start to slow.
There are several hands on YT of the33 minute flight time....
Xiaomi Mijia 4K Action Camera - Review
Approx 4 miles distance with no accessories
4500 mAH battery
A very innovative RC design.
5.8ghz LTE Video with 2.4ghz RC transmission
At $500, this will take the air of Mavic Air and will give the mavic pro a run for itss money.
I love IT!!!
Not sure how you think that's relevant but it's a fake video from 2016 and hasn't much to do with this thread.. . .
Competition is good! With 70% market share, someone will always be nibbling at DJI’s toes. The Xioami/FIMI SE is the new kid on the block and will garner attention for a while. I watched dozens of YT videos of the SE. the missing obstacle avoidance is a deal breaker for me and many other newbies.Xiaomi Mijia 4K Action Camera - Review
Approx 4 miles distance with no accessories
4500 mAH battery
A very innovative RC design.
5.8ghz LTE Video with 2.4ghz RC transmission
At $500, this will take the air of Mavic Air and will give the mavic pro a run for itss money.
I love IT!!!
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.