Which is why I made my point above (that we should avoid talking about the app agreement as it's not what this thread is about). This thread is talking about a lawsuit based on the service given under the terms of the warranty. Not specifically what the warranty states, only that a warranty is given and not acted on as a whole. It's not about using the app. So what I stated still applies, if I offer 5% and then simply don't follow any of the promises in the contract, you'd have every right to bring a lawsuit. To complain that someone should not bring a lawsuit to enforce their promised rights just because it might make the product more expensive is insulting.If you loaned me money at 5% then upped to 10% I would have to go back and look at your terms of service that I agreed to.
Being a foreign based company does not matter. DJI has offices based here in the US and sells it's products in the US. So it does not matter that they are based on China.Luckily I have never had to deal with DJI's customer service in 10 years of using their products but I buy from Chinese companies fully knowing their reputation and business practices .
We are not talking about over-stating capabilities of the product at all. DJI is one of the best Chinese companies? You may want to check on this. I'm sure Lenovo would disagree. When it comes to Chinese companies that have world markets, DJI is not even on the radar in size or service.They have always overstated a products capability to make a sale and customer service is a trait that still eludes them . Dji is actually one of the best Chinese companies out there .
As you've mentioned, you've never had a claim so I'm not sure you really have a voice. When you have paid $1000 for something and it simply fails due to a defect, that defect is covered under warranty and DJI simply refuses to do anything... then come back and let us know you don't care about paying $600 for the repairs.Anyone wishing to pursue a lawsuit over such trivial matters will probably fork out more than would be gained . After having signed a terms of service I'd be surprised if any lawyer would even touch it anyway .
It's not expensive to legally enforce the warranty. I can't say its "easy" but its not expensive. I can speak first hand on this. DJI denied my warranty claim. They confirmed the loss occurred within the warranty period, that I filed the claim within the warranty period but denied the claim only because they did not receive the Phantom within the warranty period. I ended up having a nice in person discussion with DJI in my local court house (and nice prior emails with their cooperate attorney).