RAFALE
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2016
- Messages
- 56
- Reactions
- 30
- Age
- 48
refer to downlink bandwithHUH !!!
What !!!
Please explain further, this one missed me.
Rob
refer to downlink bandwithHUH !!!
What !!!
Please explain further, this one missed me.
Rob
10 vs 20 deals with the band witdth
10 is narrow so it'll pierce better trees etc (than 20)
20 is large so it'll spread better for long distance
I am quite sure that the discussion we have deals with this details...
I would be glad if someone as the knowledge to share on this subject and it's evolutions between FW.
(this doesn't deals with NFZ troubles we encountered in the .500)
Rob,The Bandwidth being narrow is really not going to make any real difference to penetration or distance. As a matter of fact the more bandwidth you have means the more data that can be sent and the more error correction data that can be incorporated. Knowing that 10Mhz is the only setting now gives me a better idea as to why my signal just dropped out like that on .500
With 20Mhz BW they can incorporate a lot more error correction and prevent video breakup. The only expense is that less people can use the same section of BW and it's possible to pick up more interference.
City flying then 10Mhz might be safer.
Flying in rural areas you will always want 20Mhz turned on.
Rob
Rob,
I was curious and just checked. FW .500 does still offer the option of 10Mhz or 20Mhz BW.
I did change to .400 yesterday evening but before on .500 I did not get the chance to change between 10 and 20.
it is a point that DJI would help by clarifiing this and how to swap between bandwidth in the menu.
10 vs 20 deals with the band witdth
10 is narrow so it'll pierce better trees etc (than 20)
20 is large so it'll spread better for long distance
You're confusing bandwidth with wavelength. Bandwidth has to do with data transmission capacity. Wavelength is the physical wave form height. Ability to penetrate is affected by many factors, but bandwidth isn't one of them.
Rob be sure not to delete the base windows VMware image. It sounded like you might think that was possible, but it's not - the snapshots are dependent on the base image usually (ie. They only contain the changes/differences) and can't be used alone without the image which they are based off of.
What's the issue with the latest v0.600 firmware ?Rob be sure not to delete the base windows VMware image. It sounded like you might think that was possible, but it's not - the snapshots are dependent on the base image usually (ie. They only contain the changes/differences) and can't be used alone without the image which they are based off of.
Gents, this is too technical for me. I'll keep the .0400 until my Mavic can not take off again.
Do I have to be concerned with all these VMare, snapshots, battery level, Windows version, network connection, etc, etc, etc?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.